Communicate 4.1.2 Rubrics Quest
Methods & Materials for
the Gifted
Unit Assessment Rubric
Participant:
Categories for Review
|
Unsatisfactory
(0-2)
|
Developing
(3-4)
|
Adequate
(5-7)
|
Exemplary
(8)
|
Focus of Lesson
aligned with
Unit Standard(s)
|
Focus of lesson is basic and only one standard is provided
|
Focus of lesson is provided; at least one standard is provided
|
Focus of lesson is well stated and is aligned with unit
standards
|
Focus of lesson is well suited to gifted learners and
standards are clearly aligned to unit focus
|
Essential Questions
& Enduring Understandings
|
EQs and EUs do not fit
topic or are unclear for unit topic
|
3 or fewer essential
questions; EUs are minimal or basic for unit topic
|
4 questions clearly stated
and appropriate for the unit topic/ concepts along with EUs
|
5 or more highly
appropriate questions stated with enduring understandings for this unit/topic
|
Resources and/or
handouts
|
Does not contain adequate resources/
handouts to guide students.
|
The unit contains minimal resources/
or handouts to guide students.
|
The unit contains
sufficient resources and handouts to guide students’ work.
|
The unit contains a wealth
of resources and handouts to guide students’ work.
|
Research and/or gathering/ manipulation of information
|
No requirement for research
or gathering of information
|
Minimal requirement for
research or gathering of information
|
Appropriate activities
require research or gathering of information
|
Activities are extremely
well planned to guide the research and/or the gathering of information.
|
Student choice of activities/topics
|
No choices are offered
|
Choice is only included in
one activity
|
Contains at least two
opportunities of student choice
|
Contains three or more
student choices from multiple learning styles
|
Open-ended
Products/ Responses
|
No open-ended tasks are
included
|
One activity calls for
open-ended responses/ products
|
At least two activities
call for open-ended responses/products
|
Three or more activities
call for open-ended responses or products
|
Multiple sources
of information/ different perspectives
|
Little, if any, use of
varied sources of information or different perspectives
|
Minimal use of multiple
sources of information or different perspectives
|
At least one main project
requires students to seek multiple sources of information or to consider
different perspectives on the topic.
|
Two or more activities use
multiple sources of information and involve students in examining various
perspectives.
|
Assessment/
Rubrics
|
None or poorly developed;
no Pre-test
|
Two evaluations provided
but levels of quality need improvement for student guidance; Pre-test is
minimal for topic
|
At least three appropriate
evaluation methods are utilized with at least 2 rubrics with well-defined
levels of performance; Pre-test is appropriate for topic
|
Four or more appropriate
evaluation methods are utilized with at least 3 rubrics with well-defined
levels of performance; Pre-test is
appropriate for topic
|
Samples of student
work
|
No student samples are
included
|
Only one sample of student
work is included
|
At least three samples of
student work are included for major project(s)
|
At least three samples of
student work are included for two different products/projects
|
Higher Levels of
Thinking
|
Minimal use of creative or
critical thinking required
|
25% of activities promote
use of creative and/or critical thinking
|
50% of activities promote
use of creative and/or critical thinking/ problem solving
|
75% of activities promote
creative and/or critical thinking/ problem solving
|
Organization and
Overall Quality
|
Poorly developed and not
organized
|
Somewhat developed but
not well organized
|
Well developed and
organized
|
Extremely well developed
and organization is easy to follow.
|
Total points
|
|
|
|
|
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home